|By Jnan Dash||
|September 17, 2012 03:39 PM EDT||
I just read an interesting article by Howard Anderson, a professor of entrepreneurship at MIT and founder of Yankee Group and Battery Ventures. He makes an insightful analysis of Microsoft at the age of 37, so-called the middle age. He says, “You’ve got a disease. It’s called middle age. It’s harder to detect but easier to cure in its early stages; it’s easier to detect but harder to cure in its later stages. You’re about halfway.” Microsoft created 12,000 millionaires after its public offering back in 1986, and most of them are gone except two key billionaires - Ballmer and Gates.
Anderson’s language is caustic, “.. but worse, you have become … irrelevant. Kind of like Madonna. She still sells a lot of music, but nobody really notices her. Oh, you have bought things (Skype for $8.5 billion), and you still dominate office software and PC operating systems. But Bing? Yammer?”.
Or when he says, “You’re kind of like a 37-year-old who goes into a bar and says to the young barmaid: “Where have you been all of my life?” And she replies: “Well, sir, for the first 20 years, I wasn’t born.” He mentions that competing against a religion (called Apple) is hard. Young minds from schools like MIT don’t go to Microsoft any more (not due to bad weather in Seattle). Instead they go to Amazon, and Google.
I liked how he characterized Microsoft’s transition over the years – “In your youth, you were a technology company, and a great one. When everyone hates you, you must be doing something right. Then you became a marketing company. And now you’re a company that’s financially driven. Just when you think there’s nothing fundamentally wrong, there’s something fundamentally wrong.”
So what should Microsoft do? Anderson’s recommendations are pretty shocking:
“First, kill the bean counters. Go hire the best young technologists. The stock price sucks, so don’t worry about it. Spin them off into small teams. Don’t buy big companies–you will just screw them up. Buy little companies with great brains–you want their brains more than their products. Put them into a separate company, where you own 50% and these young turks together have options on the rest.
Second, cut staff, big time. Maybe 20%. I don’t know what all of those people do and neither do you.
Third, tell Steve it’s time to go. He had a good run, but it’s time. Keep Bill.”
He mentions several companies that have made a comeback from such stages of life – Apple, IBM, P&G, and Intel. The key first step is to get out of self-denial and accept the fact of your growing irrelevance.
Happy 37Th. Birthday!
Aug. 25, 2016 01:15 AM EDT Reads: 1,593
Aug. 25, 2016 12:45 AM EDT Reads: 1,898
Aug. 25, 2016 12:00 AM EDT Reads: 2,956
Aug. 24, 2016 09:15 PM EDT Reads: 1,661
Aug. 24, 2016 04:15 PM EDT Reads: 2,555
Aug. 24, 2016 04:15 PM EDT Reads: 352
Aug. 24, 2016 04:15 PM EDT Reads: 481
Aug. 24, 2016 02:15 PM EDT Reads: 1,438
Aug. 24, 2016 12:00 PM EDT Reads: 3,850
Aug. 24, 2016 11:00 AM EDT Reads: 2,113
Aug. 24, 2016 09:45 AM EDT Reads: 2,255
Aug. 24, 2016 09:00 AM EDT Reads: 3,514
Aug. 24, 2016 07:45 AM EDT Reads: 2,090
Aug. 24, 2016 07:15 AM EDT Reads: 1,661
Aug. 24, 2016 07:00 AM EDT Reads: 1,759
Aug. 24, 2016 04:30 AM EDT Reads: 2,187
Aug. 24, 2016 02:00 AM EDT Reads: 1,410
Aug. 24, 2016 01:45 AM EDT Reads: 1,886
Aug. 24, 2016 12:00 AM EDT Reads: 2,850
I wanted to gather all of my Internet of Things (IOT) blogs into a single blog (that I could later use with my University of San Francisco (USF) Big Data “MBA” course). However as I started to pull these blogs together, I realized that my IOT discussion lacked a vision; it lacked an end point towards which an organization could drive their IOT envisioning, proof of value, app dev, data engineering and data science efforts. And I think that the IOT end point is really quite simple…
Aug. 23, 2016 11:30 PM EDT Reads: 2,237