|By Bob Gourley||
|July 23, 2014 09:01 AM EDT||
In the last few years, the potential for mobile productivity has increased dramatically. Sending emails, checking calendars, receiving important notifications, and surfing the web are no longer impressive mobile feats – they are commonplace. For most, the inability to conduct such tasks is more surprising than the ability to do so.
Consumer and enterprise technology companies are taking notice. Take – for example – IBM’s recent announcement of its intention to bring its cloud services and enterprise-specific solutions to applications for iOS devices. With so many professionals working from smartphones, increasing mobile productivity seems an obvious step for IBM.
Device convergence also evidences this trend toward mobility and interchangeability, as smartphones increasingly resemble tablets and tablets increasingly resemble smartphones. Apple’s recent preview of iOS 8, the latest rendition of its mobile software, demonstrates this trend, with its emphasis on improving cross-device connectivity and interchangeability.
Understanding this trend toward mobility and interchangeability is important, as it has important implications for bosses and businesses, for buyers and sellers, and for professional use and personal use.
A recent study conducted by Nielsen, an information and market research company, reported interested findings regarding individuals’ app usage. Retrieving data from approximately 5,000 subjects with Android or iOS devices, Nielsen found that time spent within applications has exploded over the last three years. Among Nielsen’s subjects, in-application time per person per month increased from 18 hours to more than 30 from 2011 to 2013 – a more than 50% increase in just two years!
Although a significant increase of in-application time was observed, Nielsen did not find that the number of applications per user increased in a significant way. Average apps used per person increased from 26.5 in 2012 to 26.8 in 2013, which suggested to Nielsen that users have a limit to the numbers of applications they use in a given period.
“This shows that while there may be an upper limit to the total number of apps users are willing to access within a given month, the amount of time they are spending on those apps is showing no signs of slowing down.”
If an upper limit does indeed exist for the number of applications that an individual will use per month, then developers should take heed, and efforts should be placed on creating some of those applications.
May. 24, 2016 05:00 PM EDT Reads: 1,826
May. 24, 2016 04:45 PM EDT Reads: 977
May. 24, 2016 04:30 PM EDT Reads: 871
May. 24, 2016 04:00 PM EDT Reads: 2,340
May. 24, 2016 04:00 PM EDT Reads: 1,671
May. 24, 2016 03:45 PM EDT Reads: 572
May. 24, 2016 03:30 PM EDT Reads: 900
May. 24, 2016 02:15 PM EDT Reads: 2,064
May. 24, 2016 02:00 PM EDT Reads: 3,830
May. 24, 2016 01:45 PM EDT Reads: 1,350
May. 24, 2016 01:45 PM EDT Reads: 2,041
May. 24, 2016 01:30 PM EDT Reads: 1,729
May. 24, 2016 01:15 PM EDT Reads: 688
May. 24, 2016 10:30 AM EDT Reads: 706
May. 24, 2016 09:30 AM EDT Reads: 1,673
May. 24, 2016 09:00 AM EDT Reads: 1,952
May. 24, 2016 08:30 AM EDT Reads: 2,038
May. 24, 2016 06:00 AM EDT Reads: 3,378
May. 24, 2016 04:30 AM EDT Reads: 2,395
May. 24, 2016 04:00 AM EDT Reads: 3,006