Gebauer supervise désormais la vente et la distribution mondiale de sa ligne de produits EpiVision à l'interne

From the Wires

Nov. 2, 2006 04:47 PM

NEUHAUSEN, Allemagne, November 2 /PRNewswire/ -- Gebauer Medizintechnik GmbH annonce qu'elle reprendra la direction de ses réseaux de vente et de distribution mondiaux pour sa ligne de produits EpiVision. Le Gebauer EpiVision System est un instrument chirurgical ophtalmique pour l'Epi-LASIK et les procédés d'ablation de surface avancés qui était auparavant commercialisé en exclusivité par la société CooperVision Surgical.

<< En dirigeant nos ventes et notre distribution nous-mêmes, nous serons plus proches de nos partenaires de distribution et, fait encore plus important, de nos clients. Ainsi, nous serons bien placés pour offrir un service à la clientèle direct, efficace et plus rapide. Ce changement stratégique renforcera notre part de marché et améliorera notre présence sur le marché >>, a déclaré Steffen Gebauer, directeur général de la société.

La société est également impatiente de travailler avec l'actuel réseau de distribution d'EpiVision afin d'améliorer et de poursuivre le fort développement mené ces dernières années.

Durant ces 28 dernières années, Gebauer a acquis une ample expérience en transformant de nouvelles idées de technologie en produits pleinement développés, extrêmement performants et de qualité supérieure. Gebauer, une société à responsabilité limitée installée à Neuhausen en Allemagne, offre des services de conception d'ingénierie de précision, d'intégration de composants, de développement électronique, de création de logiciels et le plus haut niveau d'assurance-qualité de fabrication pour l'ensemble de ses dispositifs médicaux.

Le Gebauer EpiVision[TM] System avec séparateur MicronEdge[TM] est le principal produit technologique pour l'Epi-LASIK et les procédés d'ablation de surface avancés.

Pour de plus amples renseignements, veuillez contacter : Steffen Gebauer Gebauer Medizintechnik GmbH Monbachstrasse 7/1 75242 Neuhausen / Enzkreis Allemagne Tél.: +49-(0)-7234-9421-0 Fax : +49-(0)-7234-9421-20 e-mail : info@epivision.de

Gebauer Medizintechnik GmbH

Pour de plus amples renseignements, veuillez contacter : Steffen Gebauer, Gebauer Medizintechnik GmbH, Monbachstrasse 7/1, 75242 Neuhausen / Enzkreis, Allemagne, Tél. : +49-(0)-7234-9421-0, Fax : +49-(0)-7234-9421-20, e-mail : info@epivision.de

Published Nov. 2, 2006
Copyright © 2008 SYS-CON Media. All Rights Reserved.

About PR Newswire
Copyright © 2007 PR Newswire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PRNewswire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of PRNewswire. PRNewswire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

YOUR FEEDBACK

JavaServer Faces (JSF) vs Struts

Jan Naude wrote: Relating to Doug Smith's question: Doug, I think you misunderstand MVC. The components are: Model (data retrieved/manipulated by business rules) View (responsible for rendering/displaying relevant information to user) Controller - business logic that operates on/manipulates model to produce data to be displayed by view. The idea with MVC is not to mix business logic (i.e. Servlets/Struts actions) and presentation logic (jsp/html) in the same artifacts (components), because then you end up not being able to replace/change one without having to replace/change the other. JSF focuses more on easily developing the View part, while Struts concentrates more on Model and Controller and their integration.

read more & respond »

JavaServer Faces (JSF) vs Struts

Jose Arco wrote: Hi, Really interesting article. I have a related question. We have a web acces application based completly on Struts. Now we want to add a new funcionality based on JSF, the question is if we could have integration problems between both tools. Thanks in advanced

read more & respond »

JavaServer Faces (JSF) vs Struts

bill wrote: it would be nice to redo this comparison TODAY in 2007 and see what comes out. Struts2 has really added a ton to their side and JSF components have matured. I would like to see a modern comparison- as there does not seem to be one.

read more & respond »

JavaServer Faces (JSF) vs Struts

wildcat wrote: Hi, Yes JSF is the way to go. The thing which I like the most about JSF is the finer control given by the component based architechture which is the key for RAD tools..like .NET. Java is up there facing a string competition form .NET but hey JAVA will WIN.

read more & respond »

JavaServer Faces (JSF) vs Struts

Doug Smith wrote: Friends, this is going to sound like a really dumb question, but I am asking in all sincerity. While I understand the arguments to separate view (screen) from model (database & rules) & control (keyboard), I'm not sure I understand why I need Struts or JSF to do this. I can put code a View as a JSP, interact with the Model using Javabeans, and exercise Control using HTML or JSP directives. What exactly are the benefits using either Struts or JSF? The cost is obvious - another set of things to learn and configure. (Asked by a solo practitioner who doesn't work with graphic designers).

read more & respond »

JavaServer Faces (JSF) vs Struts

David Thirakul wrote: Very interesting article, thank you. We are currently working extensively with Struts for the presentation layer and are watching the progress of JSF with much interest because it seems to be the way to go in the long term. There is no doubt that JSF will take over as McClanahan stated himself when he was talking about migrating to JSF. (see http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=29068). There's no new development on Struts as opposed to JSF which by the way is the answer to MS webforms. So to answer Tom's comment, yes there is overlaping and if you start a new project from scratch and want to compare struts and jsf, roland's article is very insightful. What I would like to point out also is that JSF seem to lack the ease of use and functionnality of webforms, that's why all the new development goes into JSF, there's a lot of catching up to do...

read more & respond »

JavaServer Faces (JSF) vs Struts

Roland Barcia wrote: Thanks for the feedback. Craig has a vested interest in both frameworks. There are features in Struts that compliment JSF like Tiles and the Validation framework. But just because they have some areas where they can work together does not mean I cannot compare them both. In this article, I focus on the Core of the frameworks and how they differ. I see very little benefit with the current Struts implementation to mix the Struts controller with the JSF components.

read more & respond »

JavaServer Faces (JSF) vs Struts

Tom Roche wrote: To speak of "JSF vs Struts" displays a lack of understanding of the different specializations of the two frameworks. JSF specializes in view, Struts in model and control. The two can be used together via the Struts-Faces Integration Library. As Craig McClanahan's inaugural blog post http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/craigmcc/20040927#struts_or_jsf_struts_and points out: > For new development, here's the best strategy for determining what > to do: > * Evaluate the two technologies individually, to see if they satisfy > your requirements. > * If one or the other technology is sufficient, go ahead and use it > (it's easier to learn and use one technology rather than two where > possible); keeping in mind, however, the caveats about Struts HTML > tags mentioned above. > * If your requirements include unique features supported only by > Struts (such as Til...

read more & respond »

WEBSPHERE LATEST STORIES . . .

Top Keynotes at SYS-CON's World-Beating RIA Conference & Expo: AJAX World

By RIA News Desk

Two of the biggest launches in Rich Internet Application history took place in 2007/2008 when Adobe launched AIR 1.0 in February '08 and Microsoft launched Silverlight (September '07). At the 6th International AJAXWorld RIA Conference & Expo in October SYS-CON Events is delighted to be...

SYS-CON.TV: View "Virtualization Power Panel" Live from Times Square, NYC

By Virtualization News Desk

Red Hat CTO Brian Stevens, Citrix CTO Simon Crosby, Egenera CTO Pete Manca, Allen Stewart, Group Manager, Windows Virtualization at Microsoft, and Brian Duckering, Sr. Director of Products and Alliances at Symantec were the top industry executives who joined Jeremy Geelan in the 4th Fl...

IBM's SOA Software and Vantage Deluxe World Travel Make It Easier for Travelers to Book Vacations

By SOA World Magazine News Desk

IBM announced that Vantage Deluxe World Travel has increased sales and improved business operations since turning to IBM to run its Web site and online booking system. Since switching to IBM WebSphere Commerce software, Vantage Travel has reduced order-taking time by 80 percent and inc...

Microsoft's Virtualization Chief Mike Neil To Keynote SYS-CON's Virtualization Conference & Expo

By Virtualization News Desk

Mike Neil is general manager for virtualization strategy in the Windows Server Division at Microsoft. Mike is focused on the delivery of the Windows virtualization technology, including Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V, Microsoft Hyper-V Server and Virtual PC 2007. Mike also directs the tec...

AJAX RIA Toolset for IBM WebSphere Platform Released

By RIA News Desk

The AJAX for IBM WebSphere Platform Early Program is an optionally installable product extension for IBM WebSphere Application Server Version 6.1 and WebSphere Application Server Community Edition that offers targeted, incremental new features that can make Web applications running on ...

Unify Expands Composer to Create an End-to-end Solution for Lotus Notes Application Migrations

By WebSphere News Desk

Unify announced the expansion of its Composer for Lotus Notes solution through a partnership with CASAHL Technology. Partnering with CASAHL extends the Composer solution to include an assessment of the Lotus Notes infrastructure in order to inventory, categorize and analyze the types o...